MGB 502 - 509
Printed From: BMPT Forum
Category: Boats (In alphabetical order)
Forum Name: Motor Gun Boats
Forum Description: Discussion on Motor Gun Boats
URL: http://www.bmpt.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=272
Printed Date: 26 March 2026 at 7:37pm
Topic: MGB 502 - 509
Posted By: angriff
Subject: MGB 502 - 509
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 7:29pm
|
Anybody know much about these blockade runner types CAMPER AND NICHOLSON MGBs 502 - 509? Pictures or drawings would be wonderful. Book leads that may discuss or show the same would also be welcome.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Pioneer
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 8:04pm
|
Hello Richard
Welcome aboard
While we all wait for John Lambert and Al Ross's Volume 3 - where there may be some info on these boats - you can try this link
http://www.nelmes.fsnet.co.uk/paxman/blockade.htm - http://www.nelmes.fsnet.co.uk/paxman/blockade.htm
may be something of interest for you
Regards
------------- Pioneer - Forum Moderator
|
Posted By: Christian
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 8:27pm
|

Hi Angrif
There's plenty of shots of this class on the 'net, this is my favourite.
|
Posted By: johnk
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 10:24pm
|
Hello there,
Just seen shot of 502 above! quite something, is it me or dose she look quite different from other vessels ie Fairmiles etc? any way, a fine looking vessel. Small question, have got a copy of The Yacthsman magzine from winter 1945, yes very just post war!, on the front is a shot of ASR 2268 just launched ex BPB Co. Tride to find her on that web-site listing all UK and foreign navies which I have been onto many times before, ex this site, but can I find it! any one with info re link or on this vessel, would appreciate it. Many thanks,
Regards
John
|
Posted By: northeastuser
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 10:43pm
|
http://www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk/royal.htm - http://www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk/royal.htm
This one?However it just seems to cover RN and not RAF. I am of course assuming that ASR 2268 would be an RAF vessel.
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 2:36am
|
Funny I found those sights too. Thanks for the picture but I am wondering if 502 is the right number. (there was no link) Is that the 117 foot blockade runners that brought 800 tons of ball bearings and machined goods from Sweden?
Do you have any line drawings on here and what is her armament in 1943?
|
Posted By: johnk
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 7:55am
|
Hi Northeastuser,
Many thanks for the link, now I see it of course I remember it!, quite right it is Royal Naval not RAF but tride that and found not a lot! but will search again, many thanks again.
John
|
Posted By: johnk
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 8:07am
|
Hi Again,
Just had a look on the link, indeed all naval, but still most interesting. Must be listed somewhere surely, will just have to keep looking.
John
|
Posted By: Pioneer
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 8:56am
|
Any Use?
HISTORIES
| 502 |
completed as MGB, became MGB 2002 in 1945, mined in Skagerrak 12/5/45. |
| 503 |
completed as MGB, became MGB 2003 in 1945. |
| 504 |
completed as HOPEWELL, became MGB 504 in 1944 and MGB 2004 in 1945. |
| 505 |
completed as NONSUCH, became MGB 505 in 1944 and MGB 2005 in 1945. |
| 506 |
completed as GAY VIKING, lost 5/2/45 returning from Sweden to UK, operation "Moonshine". Later raised and refitted. Known to have been in existence in 1970 as a pleasure craft in Bahamas as BAHAMAS VIKING. |
| 507 |
completed as GAY CORSAIR, became MGB 507 in 1944, and MGB 2007 in 1945. Stranded and foundered off Aberdeen 24/5/45. |
| 508 |
completed as MASTER STANDFAST, captured by German forces on 2/11/43 during "Operation Bridford". |
| 509 |
completed as MGB 509, became MGB 2009 in 1945. Converted to gas turbine propulsion (centre shaft) in 1947.
| Regards
------------- Pioneer - Forum Moderator
|
Posted By: Christian
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 10:57pm
|
Angrif,

Running ball-bearings

The early Gatric gas-turbine tests (why did they then build the Packard driven Gays and Deltic driven Darks?)
|
Posted By: Christian
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 11:02pm
|
Hi John
Please scan and post the ASR picture, 2268 was not a number assigned to a RAF HSL. Very curious. Is the number actually painted on the side?
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 06 February 2007 at 2:10am
|
Is that really how the blockade runners were outfitted? They had three petrol engines I thought.
The Gas Turbines were not used till later, correct? Was that a picture of the converted vessels after the war?
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 06 February 2007 at 2:16am
|
The bridge looks completely different. Any Armament data?
|
Posted By: Pioneer
Date Posted: 06 February 2007 at 2:44pm
|
The MGB’s 502 -508 were powered by Paxman V12 Diesels while MGB509 was powered by 3 Packard Petrol Engines – it was this boat (509) that was selected to test the ‘Gatric’ Gas Turbine engine in 1947.
502 and 503 were completed and remained as heavily armed (but no Tubes) RN MGB’s .
For Political reasons 504 -508 were completed as Merchant Ships and given the names of ‘Hopewell’ –‘Nonsuch’ – ‘Gay Viking’ – ‘Gay Corsair’ – ‘Master Standfast’ (no prefix of HMS). These craft were only ‘lightly armed’ (as a ‘norm’ for Merchantmen of that time) but no Tubes or heavy armament, these 5 having major below Deck modifications to accommodate cargo in Holds. Crewed by civilian’s – Trawlermen from Hull and Officers from the Ellerman Wilson Coy staff – operating under the Merchant Red Ensign – it was these 5 craft that had a notable career as ‘Blockade Runners’.
509 was completed as an RN MGB with the 3 Packard motor’s – the ‘Gatric’ experiment with marine Gas Turbines being planned as long before as 1943 (before launch of the boat). Some doubt as to what was the first GT powered craft – this or HMS Grey Goose.
Sources:-
Accession Number : ADA037686 Title : The Marine Gas Turbine--The UK Provides a Case Study in Technological Development,
and
Metropolitan-Vickers Electrical Co. Ltd. 1899 - 1949 by John Dummelow M.A., A.M.I.E.E.
------------- Pioneer - Forum Moderator
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 1:00am
|
Ok .. lightly armed. I can see why that is the case but what was it? Dual Lewis guns? Anybody know?
Christian you know where I can get a larger picture? I would like to see exterior details on the bridge and lookout mast.
|
Posted By: Christian
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 10:50am
|


Armament 2 twin Oerlikon 20mm, 2 twin and 1 quadruple .303 Vickers.
|
Posted By: Pioneer
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 11:13am
|
Some 'light armament' !! - Lt Cdr Len Barlow states those figures but I would suggest that they reflect the post 1944 survivors as it would be very difficult to 'ship' inboard that amount of armament when entering a neutral Country (Sweden) - risking being 'interned'.
Maybe someone could enlighten us?
------------- Pioneer - Forum Moderator
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 1:34am
|
Man thanks alot you guys walk on water... Now all I want to do is figure out how to make a model of it. Thanks again.
Any pics of diagrams of the bridge? Wonders where they put all that armament. I see what looks like dual 303s on the after deck a mabye a single 20 mm..
|
Posted By: angriff
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 3:12am
Pioneer wrote:
Some 'light armament' !! - Lt Cdr Len Barlow states those figures but I would suggest that they reflect the post 1944 survivors as it would be very difficult to 'ship' inboard that amount of armament when entering a neutral Country (Sweden) - risking being 'interned'.
Maybe someone could enlighten us?
|
Why would they have to shift them inboard? The vessel would not be a registered man of war
|
Posted By: Pioneer
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 9:19am
|
Any Country posing as a 'Neutral' would be under some scruitiny by both 'sides' to make sure that - the other 'side' - was not gaining any advantage. (ie Montivideo and Graf Spey). A Warship would only be allowed to stay for a very limited period for repairs to make it seaworthy - after which it would be interned. Technically 4 of that class were Registered as Merchantmen but it would obviously be a moot point to argue - as I am sure it was- that any ship bristling with armament would/could be breaching any Neutrality Law's - At that stage in the War it really was not seen that Germany would 'lose' and Sweden- no matter where her sympathy lay - would not wish to risk having herself 'occupied'. It would be interesting to hear from anyone with knowledge of the finer points of Neutrality law's then in force. All of the surviving members of the 'Merchantmen' of that class were taken over by the RN - dropped their 'disguises' - and became MGB's in 1944.
Good luck with the Model Richard - don't forget to post some pictures of the build for us all to see. (If you go to - Where Are The Personnel Now - and read O/S Tom Chapman - he made a very similar model of a Camper Nicholson)
Regards
------------- Pioneer - Forum Moderator
|
Posted By: johnk
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 5:45pm
|
Hi All,
Regards the neutrality business, although many from the Republic of Ireland served in the armned forces of the UK in WW2 and came over to work in our factories, Ireland was supposed to be neutral, but heard from a friend who served in the RN then who was at a postwar meeting in Germany with veterans of the Kreigsmarine, who said they liked "Porter" beer? during the war, my friend asked how did they get it, and they said whilst ashore as thier U-boats were re-fuelling in Ireland! well, all history now of course but interesting I think,
John
|
Posted By: Christian
Date Posted: 13 February 2007 at 3:10pm
|

Hi JohnK
The mystery of HSL 2268 resolved, she was 2688, a Hants & Dorset!
Many thanks,
|
Posted By: johnk
Date Posted: 13 February 2007 at 9:24pm
|
Hi Christian,
Glad you got the mags OK, indeed, me again, got the numbers completly wrong! did not have the mag with me, must be a sign of something! any way, thanks for posting the image, I hope others enjoy it as well.
Regards
John
|
|