![]() |
Trust History. |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 234 |
| Author | |
tramontana
Senior Member
Joined: 06 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 418 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 November 2007 at 12:55pm |
|
The reason why I have made the comment in relation to a trust and the term "Trojan Horse" was that sometime after Phil cleared off with his boats I was contacted by another person (who must have been involved with the Trust to get my details) and asked was I interested in getting involved in another project to buy and refurbish a W.W.2 vessel under a Trust status, what put me off was his proposed Rule 13 (always a bad number) which indicated that at some point in the future the boat would have to be put in his name for legal reasons?. Will / have the remaining vessels that this Trust own's or rebuilt under Trust Status been put in any person/s name?
|
|
![]() |
|
Pathfinder
Admin Group
Pathfinder Joined: 06 December 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 November 2007 at 1:13pm |
|
Re yours and the Trust history. We need to keep this site for Trust History if possible please, as otherwise it veers off in all and sundry directions. The Trust cannot under any circumstances put a Trust owned boat under private members names. If the Trust sells a boat then obviuosly it passes out of Trust ownership. This is quite in order. After the departure from Marchwood, certain members considered it their prerogative to use the Trust address list for their own ends. We did apologise for this at the time,as soon as we were advised that this had happened. We have sorted many of those long gone differences out hopefully, and are now at peace with most...!! |
|
|
Pathfinder - Forum Moderator
|
|
![]() |
|
tramontana
Senior Member
Joined: 06 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 418 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 November 2007 at 2:09pm |
|
Hopefully if the boat side has a future and further boats are obtained we stick to what I thought was the remit of this Trust and confine ourselves to BRITISH MILITARY POWER BOAT PRESERVATION there are plenty still out there and some famous one's too that could do with a hand, not as you say veer off in all and sundry directions on boats that do not come under that umbrella wasting time and money. If the Trust sells a boat it should not be sold to member's, ex members or their relatives in my veiw.
|
|
![]() |
|
johnk
Senior Member
Joined: 25 March 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1355 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 November 2007 at 6:10pm |
|
I see both points above, sounds a bit fence sitting I know, but I believe all of us who take an interest via this forum would hope that going forward along with a number of people who are walking the walk so to speak, ie Medusa and MTB 102 plus it has to be said the work going on with FMB Ark Royal despite the set back of the fire, that more can be done for our coastal forces craft by working together and contributing in any way possible, and hopefully learning from past problems.
Johnk |
|
![]() |
|
Christian
Senior Member
Joined: 17 June 2005 Location: Gibraltar Status: Offline Points: 775 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 July 2012 at 12:43pm |
|
HSL 142's transom has made it to the museum;
http://www.tangmere-museum.org.uk/artefact-month/the-transom-of-raf-high-speed-launch-142 Edited by Pioneer - 16 July 2012 at 2:44pm |
|
![]() |
|
phil
Newbie
Joined: 01 April 2009 Status: Offline Points: 37 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 July 2012 at 1:37pm |
|
shame about the rest of it the BMPT broke up, an unbelievable act of heritage vandalism by people who were put in place to safeguard pieces of maritime heritage . The trustees and chairman should have been strung up for such an offense . I hope tangmere name and shame the people responsible .
|
|
![]() |
|
Pathfinder
Admin Group
Pathfinder Joined: 06 December 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 July 2012 at 5:12pm |
|
HSL142 was offered a home at the Husbands shipyard, to allow the owner to undertake her restoration.During its time under the original management, she was lifted, and in the process her back was broken.
The Trust had to close its doors and move out of Husbands, as the site had been sold. To this end every effort, over a 2 year period,was taken to return the boats to their owners where known, or a new home found for them, where possible. The owner of HSL142, in close cooperation with the Chairman and the Trustees,did everything within their power to reach a satisfactory solution, for HSL142, as well as the many other problems facing them. HSL 142 was offered,in local, national media outlets, and on e-bay, to anyone who would be prepared to take her on. The Trust had 7 interested parties visit to view the boat. Due to her run-down condition (due to covers being allowed to blow away) and her broken back, none of these parties would take her on. In the end, the Trust had to request a final decision from the owner, who with great reluctance, asked that she be broken up. Criticism is always welcome on the forum, but this should be of a constructive nature, not abusive and libelous. Future such accusations will be referred to Solicitors for further action. |
|
|
Pathfinder - Forum Moderator
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 234 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |